Archive
(1,720 Total Articles)Every story we have published, newest first.
Page 13 of 15.
ForeFront Power has completed a solar canopy paired with battery storage for Ventura County, adding local generation and backup capacity in one site. Projects like this matter because they combine clean power with flexibility, helping public facilities manage demand and improve resilience while supporting broader solar and storage deployment.
The piece appears to cover local climate advocates pressing for cleaner-energy policy in Washington. The likely impact is modest but practical, with attention on how citizen lobbying can support broader federal action on decarbonization, incentives, and grid-related clean-energy deployment.
The event appears to use a cultural milestone to recognize clean energy efforts connected to Standing Rock and Indigenous communities. The practical signal is modest but relevant: it points to local leadership and public recognition as part of broader clean energy adoption.
PSE&G is testing how residential batteries can support the grid beyond backup power. The pilot points to a broader utility effort to manage peak demand, improve reliability, and prepare for more distributed energy resources across its service territory.
Eos Energy is working with WATTMORE on software integration for battery storage systems. The deal points to a growing need for tools that help storage assets operate more efficiently and connect more cleanly with the grid and market systems.
Maine regulators have chosen a developer for an 800-megawatt wind project in northern Maine, moving a large utility-scale project closer to the point where it can be built. The decision matters for New England because new onshore wind can add zero-carbon power to the regional mix, but the project will still depend on permitting, transmission, and local acceptance before it can deliver electricity at scale.
Pennsylvania is putting public money behind rooftop and on-site solar at schools, which can lower operating costs while giving districts a practical path into clean power. The program also broadens distributed solar deployment beyond homes and businesses, with benefits for emissions cuts, local resilience, and long-term demand for solar installation and financing services.
The story frames New York’s green-energy policy as a costlier-than-expected experiment, with ratepayers covering the difference. That points to political pressure on clean-energy programs to prove they can cut emissions without raising electricity bills or undermining public support.
The Eugene City Council is taking a neutral stance on a local Clean Energy Fund initiative. That keeps the city from formally endorsing the measure and leaves the outcome to voters or the broader policy process, which matters for how local clean-energy funding could be built and financed.
The groundbreaking signals another attempt to build out advanced clean-energy infrastructure in New Mexico, with political and industry figures using the event to emphasize the state’s role in the transition. The piece matters less as a single project update than as a marker of how clean-energy investment now depends on public support, technology credibility, and local permitting.
A large battery storage project planned for a former BASF industrial site points to continued reuse of legacy land for grid infrastructure. The project reflects how storage is moving into more visible, utility-scale deployment to support reliability and renewable integration.
Community banks have invested more than $1 billion through KeyState’s tax credit platform, underscoring how tax-credit financing is becoming a larger channel for clean-energy project capital. The scale matters for deployment because it broadens the pool of lenders that can support solar, storage, and other projects that rely on tax incentives to move forward.
Aggreko’s move toward a New York listing points to continued investor interest in companies tied to power supply, backup generation, and distributed energy services. For the clean-energy transition, the market signal is less about new renewable capacity and more about the capital structure and geographic reach of firms that support grid reliability and project deployment.
Comstock’s move shifts the company away from mine assets and toward recycling and clean-energy activities. The change reflects a broader pattern in which miners and materials firms try to capture value from the energy transition instead of relying only on extraction.
Rhode Island’s governor’s race is being framed around a basic clean-energy question: whether lower power costs should come from more gas pipeline capacity or from renewables. The answer matters for near-term price relief, grid planning, and the state’s longer-run emissions path.
Industry discussion around Nebraska’s rising power needs points to a state-level conversation about how to add supply while keeping the grid reliable and affordable. The focus on renewable energy suggests local utilities and developers are weighing how much wind and solar can help meet demand growth and support longer-term decarbonization.
A zinc-based battery system has been brought forward for Nebraska City’s downtown grid. The project points to continued interest in non-lithium storage options for local grid support, where durability, safety, and deployment at community scale matter more than long-duration hype.
This appears to be a policy and investment discussion about how clean-energy capital is changing under competitiveness and climate-resilience pressures. The likely focus is how investors and developers should think about project risk, supply chains, and long-term deployment conditions rather than a single technology or project.
Appalachia is seeing a sharp drop in clean-energy investment, which points to weaker project momentum in a region long tied to fossil fuels. That matters for local job creation, grid diversification, and the pace of solar and related deployment in parts of the United States that have been trying to attract new energy spending.
The Town of Ulster is considering a lead agency role in the review of a battery project, which points to a local permitting and land-use decision rather than a construction or financing milestone. For clean-energy deployment, the key issue is whether the project can move through municipal review and site approval in a way that supports storage buildout and grid reliability.
A Toyota dealership appears to have cut its electricity costs significantly while still operating DC fast chargers. The example matters because it suggests charging infrastructure can be added without locking site operators into higher bills, which supports broader EV adoption and cleaner transport.
The story points to a local solar garden that pairs clean power with food production and community support. It is a small-scale example of how distributed solar can serve land use, resilience, and social needs at the same time.
The article points to a stronger political strategy by the renewable-energy sector, using election spending to protect and expand favorable policy conditions. That matters because federal and state rules still shape the pace of clean-power deployment, financing, and the economics of solar, wind, storage, and related projects.
Sauk Rapids is weighing whether to oppose a battery storage project, which shows how local permitting and community acceptance can slow deployment even for grid-flexibility assets. The decision matters for how quickly storage can be added to support reliability and renewable integration in the region.
This looks like a local clean-energy reimbursement story rather than a market-moving oil and gas development, so it has limited relevance for upstream capital allocation or basin activity. It may matter mainly as a signal of how public-sector institutions are financing distributed power and environmental projects, but not enough to imply broader industry shift.