Archive
(1,184 Total Articles)Every story we have published, newest first.
Page 1 of 2.
This is an unusual example of an older offshore gas platform being brought back into service with wind power supplying its own turbines. It shows how existing oil and gas infrastructure can be adapted to lower operating emissions without building a new asset from scratch.
Offshore wind developers still need clearer rules and fewer procedural delays before projects can move from planning to construction. The piece points to the same core issue across many markets: policy support alone is not enough if permits, grid access, or other bottlenecks keep capital on the sidelines.
China’s first 18-MW offshore wind project entering operation marks another step in the move toward larger turbines and more efficient offshore buildouts. For developers and utilities, bigger units can improve project economics and help scale clean power in coastal markets where land is constrained.
The funding cut points to slower support for Italy’s offshore wind buildout and raises the risk that port upgrades needed for assembly and logistics will be delayed. Taranto and Augusta matter because port infrastructure is a key constraint on moving offshore wind projects from planning into deployment.
Gazelle Wind Power is developing a floating platform aimed at very large offshore turbines, which points to the next phase of offshore wind engineering. If the design proves bankable, it could help unlock deeper-water projects and improve deployment options for high-capacity turbines.
A company combination has been selected to cut the cost of floating wind power. That matters because lower project costs could make deep-water offshore wind more bankable and widen the set of markets where it can compete.
The BIODHYL project adds field data on biofouling, a practical maintenance issue for offshore renewable assets. That matters for offshore wind and other marine energy projects because it can affect operating costs, reliability, and long-term performance.
The story points to a possible U.S. test site for Carnegie Clean Energy’s CETO wave power demo. That matters because wave energy remains early-stage, and any move toward a demonstration site is about proving reliability, lowering technical risk, and seeing whether the technology can move closer to commercial use.
Ørsted is using the Korea Energy Expo to signal continued interest in offshore wind development in Incheon. The headline points to early-stage market positioning rather than a financing or construction milestone, but it still matters because it reflects ongoing offshore wind buildout interest in South Korea.
Financial close on Gennaker moves an offshore wind project from planning into a bankable build phase. That matters for the wider market because it signals lender confidence and keeps the project on track to add utility-scale clean power to the European generation mix.
An offshore wind developer is being tied to an investment push, suggesting the project is being used to attract capital and advance deployment. The story matters most for what it signals about financing conditions for new wind capacity, rather than any single operational milestone.
A legal and tax dispute around offshore wind has been resolved in Orsted’s favor, which could reduce a cost burden that mattered not just to one company but to the economics of offshore wind projects more broadly. The result is relevant for project financing and policy treatment in a segment that still depends on stable rules to support large-scale deployment.
The proposal combines coastal protection with clean power generation, which makes it more of an infrastructure concept than a conventional renewable project. If advanced, it would raise questions about permitting, maritime engineering, and whether the energy output is practical enough to matter beyond the shoreline benefits.
Denmark's shift from uncapped merchant risk to two-way Contracts for Difference turned a zero-bid North Sea auction into seven bids, offering a template now being watched across Germany and the Netherlands.
Denmark's shift from uncapped merchant risk to two-way Contracts for Difference turned a zero-bid North Sea auction into seven bids, offering a template now being watched across Germany and the Netherlands.
A Norwegian floating solar design has cleared an independent certification after being tested in rough seas. The result matters for offshore and coastal deployments, where durability has been a major barrier to adding solar capacity near populated and industrial shoreline markets.
Denmark's offshore wind buildout is being framed as a regional infrastructure play rather than a domestic power story. If the energy islands advance as intended, they could help move large volumes of wind power into the grid and support cross-border balancing, which matters for reliability, market integration, and faster decarbonization across northern Europe.
A camera study of a tidal turbine in Washington adds a small but useful data point on how marine life interacts with in-water power equipment. The main takeaway is that site conditions and animal behavior matter for environmental risk assessment as tidal power moves from concept toward real deployment.
The project launch signals continued buildout of offshore wind in South Korea, with local and national stakes around clean power supply, port and grid infrastructure, and future industrial demand. It also shows that offshore wind remains in the project-development stage in the region, where execution and permitting will determine how quickly capacity reaches the grid.
The European Investment Bank is supporting early-stage work on Morocco’s first offshore wind project. That points to financing interest in a new market, but the immediate impact is still limited to project development and feasibility rather than construction or power delivery.
California is moving to challenge a federal offshore wind deal, signaling another round of legal and political friction between the Trump administration and clean-energy developers. The immediate impact is more uncertainty for offshore wind permitting and project timelines, which can raise risk for investors and slow deployment.
A floating wind collaboration suggests continued movement in offshore wind deployment, likely aimed at making deeper-water projects more practical. The significance is in whether the partnership can help reduce technical and delivery barriers for a segment that remains early but important for scaling clean power.
This appears to be an opinion or commentary piece about offshore solar and the competing claims around who controls it, with a focus on implications for coastal communities and ocean use. The policy question matters because siting renewable energy at sea can affect permitting, environmental review, and the pace of clean-power deployment.
California is challenging a deal that would let a developer exit the Morro Bay offshore wind project, putting federal policy and project commitments back in dispute. The case matters because offshore wind on the U.S. West Coast depends on stable permitting and government support, and a pulled-back project can slow clean-power buildout and raise uncertainty for other developers.
California’s lawsuit suggests the cancellation of the Central Coast wind project is now a policy and permitting fight, not just a single project setback. The dispute matters for offshore wind and utility-scale clean power in a state that still needs large new resources to decarbonize and firm up the grid.